|
Did We Elect a Beta Male As President?
American Thinker, October 3, 2009
We're all somewhat familiar with the body
language dogs display when they greet each other. The dominant alpha male
approaches directly, asserting his authority, while the beta male genuflects,
crouches, tucks his tail, and may even end up on his back, exposing his
neck in acquiescence, making sure the alpha male knows he has no intention
of challenging him. With his "we will extend a hand if you are willing
to unclench your fist" opening to the world's dictators, the president
is exhibiting classic beta male behavior, in essence rolling over on his
back and exposing his throat to them to make sure they know he has no
intention of challenging their authority.
Of course, the problem is that he's not simply
exposing his throat, he's exposing America's collective throat, sending
the message that he's a typical beta male intent on submitting to all
the alpha male leaders around the world, and damn the consequences. His
response to the discovery of Iran's newest, and heretofore "secret,"
nuclear facility was, as Daniel Henninger (Wall Street Journal, October
1, 2009) points out, to have our State Department offer to start a direct
dialogue with the tyrannical Burmese regime. The Obama administration
has also offered conciliatory gestures to the genocidal Sudanese leader
Omar Hassan al-Bashir, and it has dispatched none other than John Kerry
to meet with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad. This, of course, is not to
mention his somewhat more visible overtures to the world's alpha male
thugs: Obama has consorted jovially with Hugo Chavez and his counterpart
Daniel Ortega, he's bowed down to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, he's
agreed to halt plans to install a missile defense system in eastern Europe
to placate Vladimir Putin, and he's offered the aforementioned hand to
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, despite the latter's expressed unwillingness to even
agree to acknowledge the truly important issue of Iran's nuclear weapons
in our talks, all quintessential beta male behaviors.
While we've all been seeking a political
rationale for the president's actions, his behavior goes beyond the political
to something deeper and more personal: like all beta males, Barack Obama
simply does not have the temperament to confront tyrannical alpha males
around the globe. In this light, even his inability to work with American
allies Gordon Brown and Nikolas Sarkozy is a function of his being incapable
of facing down the world's tyrants: to cooperate with our allies would
require Obama to display alpha male behaviors, including demonstrating
courage, something he's simply not capable of doing. The president's beta-male
proclivities are arguably putting the safety of his constituents, the
citizens of our country, in serious jeopardy.
Another cue to this unfortunate character
trait of the president's can be found in the lack of assertiveness of
his oratorical style. While many people insist that Barack Obama is a
wonderful speaker, in fact, he exhibits less emotional range when he addresses
a crowd than his predecessor, George W. Bush, did. He may have better
speechwriters than W, but his delivery is monotonic and his cadences clipped,
both signs of a beta male, unsure of himself, putting his words out there
more for the purpose of seeking approval than of providing leadership.
The president's characteristic head tilt
when he's speaking to an audience or having to deal with a tough question
when he's being interviewed (although there are certainly very few instances
of his having to do this) is another sign of submissive behavior. It crops
up less than a minute in during an interview with Fox News's Bill O'Reilly
in answer to O'Reilly's question, "Do you believe we're in a war
on terror?" After an initial "Absolutely," the president
begins to hedge, his head tilts as he explains the difficulty in sorting
out the good guys from the bad guys in the Middle East. Like beta males
everywhere, Obama is not about to commit to words that he might have to
back up with assertive action.
Being a beta male is all about developing
strategies for deflecting aggression, and for this reason, beta males
do have an important place in society. Within the confines of a social
unit, beta-male behavior can help to defuse aggression and maintain domestic
peace. But in a world where other nations' alpha-male leaders are constantly
probing for even the smallest signs of weakness, having a beta male president
has thrown into stark relief the dangers to which this president's unfortunate
character trait is exposing his country. To return to the canine metaphor:
It's the height of folly to think that other nations won't be doing everything
they can to make President Obama their bitch.
|