Why We Can't Trust Mitt
November 29, 2016
Amid the rampant speculation about who Trump will select
as his Secretary of State, the one issue on which Trump must focus is
his own professed war against the globalist elite.
While the pro-nationalist, anti-globalist movement has recently scored
critical victories with Brexit and Trumps election, globalists are
not just going to walk away from the fight.
To this point: It is highly likely that Mitt Romney is a stealth globalist
candidate for the office of Secretary of State.
If Trump is blind to this possibility, the populist foundation on which
his presidential campaign was built might well suffer a devastating blow.
The increasingly centralized control that has always been the key component
of the globalists political and financial power has meant that the
party designations Republican and Democrat are no longer meaningful in
defining what politicians and political candidates stand for.
The only meaningful way to distinguish one politician from another today
is to determine if he or she is a populist or a globalist.
The important thing those designations accomplish is to let us know whether
the political figure is in favor of government by and for the people or
government by and for the elite.
Given that the words Republican and Democrat are
no longer meaningful, we are now able to see that the 2012 presidential
election was not a contest between a Republican and a Democrat, but a
contest between two globalist candidates.
Have you ever wondered why, after he had trounced Barack Obama in their
first debate, Mitt Romney took his foot off the gas and let Obama make
a fool out of him in the final debates?
Is it out of the question to wonder whether Romney might have been told
behind the scenes by his globalist handlers to let Barack Obama win a
second term, given that Obama was doing such an excellent job of making
sure the globalist agenda was being advanced?
The globalist movement has been under way since the early
1920s, with the founding of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
In the past 50 years, CFR members have held an overwhelming majority of
all appointed U.S. cabinet positions, including Secretaries of State and
Defense. In addition, most of the top military officers of the U.S. armed
forces have also been CFR members.
In 1950, James Warburg, one of the 5,000 members of the CFR, explained
precisely to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee what the CFRs
goal was: We shall have world government whether or not you like
it, by conquest or consent.
Lifelong globalist David Rockefeller, who joined the CFR in 1949 as a
director and was one of the founders of the Trilateral Commission, another
key globalist group, clearly articulated the purpose of the globalist
movement in his 2002 autobiography, Memoirs:
For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of
the political spectrum have . . . [characterized] my family and me as
internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build
a more integrated global political and economic structure one world,
if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
Its no coincidence that U.S. Senator Barack Obama, then a political
unknown, was invited to give a speech at a CFR meeting in 2005.
Its highly likely that globalists already had him in their sights
as a possible presidential candidate.
Could there have been any other reason a freshman senator would have been
asked to speak to the CFR other than the fact that he would rubber-stamp
the groups pro-globalist policies if elected president?
The question about Mitt Romney can be put in much the same way: Can there
be any question whatsoever whether Mitt Romney would rubber-stamp the
globalists anti-populist policies if Trump selects him for Secretary
The answer to that question is an emphatic no, and for that reason, Romney
must be taken out of consideration.